The structure of Alliance for Progress was a double sooner than singe commitment. To be more exact, the Alliance had a purpose of stimulating economic expansion of the countries in Latin America due to the influx of concealed capital all at once it had to utilize the finances in the regions which were not commercial or were too dangerous for private enterprise. Speaking more about that from the financial standpoint, there was a disagreement in formulation, because economic expansion or the ends, had to be achieved by terms of the means or the private capital. The analysis of the two year implementation of the Alliance also proved the point that social reforms and private investment simply are not created to work together. Adding more to that, the modification of the Alliance after the examination of the two years operation has been made communal also supports the statement that Alliance basically was not sufficiently formulated, seeing that the advances provided under the plan were now conducted without delay to the expansion projects that did not compulsory had to be collective in nature.
In conclusion, the actual goal which was established through Alliance for Progress differed from the customary policy. While established foreign U.S. policy pointed toward spreading out own interests and positions, the ambition set by the Alliance was to conserve in the anti-revolutionary meaning. Coalition for Progress was an effort to buy a rebellion in counties of Latin America using a very small amount of savings taking into consideration the scope of troubles that the country faced at the time while the strategy was set in strength. Quite the opposite, the traditional US foreign policy was aimed at expansion; an adjustment to the Monroe Doctrine, the Roosevelt Corollary, was an expansion of the “big stick” line of attack in foreign policy of the U.S., as the United States in fact acted as a police officer in Western Hemisphere.
