Free content for your website or blog
Home About Us Article Writing Most Read Articles Authors Blog Wiki Contact Us
RSS Register Login
Topics
 
Home > Business >

Demystifying the Auditor’s Gathering of Evidence: Part One

Date Published: 12th July 2007
Bookmark and Share Republish Demystifying the Auditor’s Gathering of Evidence: Part One
Author: Olivia Hunt RSS Views: N/A PRINT ASK ABOUT THIS ARTICLE
The result of a company’s daily transaction of business is summarized in the financial statements. In these statements, we can see how established the company is, if it is earning or not, and if it is using its resources well. As such, the preparation of the financial statements is a complete managerial responsibility. Just because the management has absolute control on the data presented in the financial statements, the users, such as creditors and government regulatory bodies, cannot put a high reliance on it. This is the reason why CPA’s are hired to conduct audits.
The auditor’s responsibility is to express an opinion as to whether the financial statements are presented in accordance with certain criteria, usually generally accepted accounting principles. As part of the process, the auditor has the primary objective of detecting material understatements or overstatements embodied in the financial statements. In order to do so, the auditor gathers evidence to provide an adequate basis for his opinion. To guide the auditor in performing the activity, the Auditing Standards and Practices Council (ASPC) issued Statement of Auditing Standards of the Philippines (SASP) No. 7 – Audit Evidence and Documentation. In this statement, the third standard of fieldwork is laid: “Sufficient competent evidential matter is to be obtained through inspection, observation, inquiries, and confirmations to afford a reasonable basis for an opinion regarding the financial statements under examination.”

It could be noted that the evidential matter should be “sufficient” and “competent.” What constitute sufficiency and competence of evidence is a question that constantly perplexes the auditor in planning and performing the audit. Different situations call for different approach; unfortunately, there are no fast rules that can be readily applied to all situations. However, there are some generalizations made to guide the auditor in obtaining evidence, and these principles affect both the competence and sufficiency of evidence.

The article was produced by the writer of Essay-Paper.net. Olivia Hunt is a 4-years experienced freelance writer of College Essay Writing Service. Contact her to get English coursework and book review writing tips.
This article is free for republishing
Source: http://www.articlealley.com/article_185729_15.html
Bookmark and Share
 

Related Articles

Evaluation of Porter’s Five Forces Theory

Study of Porter’s Five Forces Theory

Porter’s Five Forces Theory: Strategies. Part One

Samsung U600 – Just gets thinner...

Professional tax preparation
Evaluation of the Five Forces Theory

Porter’s Five Forces Theory: Strategies. Part Two

profitable small businesses

Samsung F300: Double fun...always

Benefits You Avail Through Registered Office
 

Ask a Question About this Article

>> Christmas Season Coming Upon Us All Almost Every Where
>> The sallow People
>> Family Chanukah Traditions
>> Is it ok for the blood to be very bright red and ...
Powered by