You have permission to publish this article electronically or
in print, free of charge, as long as the bylines are included.
A courtesy copy of your publication would be appreciated.
The Failure of the SEO System - Part 2
I frequent a number of search engine optimization forums on a
daily basis and the one thing I see more of than anything else
are optimizers who will quickly tell you that this method is
evil, or that method is spam, or this other method is cross-
linking. The search engines each have their own policy pertaining
to these methods, and most are in the form of 'guidelines'. Note
the emphasis on the word guidelines, as I want to make it clear
what they really are.
A guideline is not a hard and fast rule, it is there to set a
basis only. Some engines say to 'avoid' this method or that one,
but they do not come right out and say not to use it at all. This
is because that while the method is abused by some, it has it's
value by legitimate relevant usage. The key word here is
relevancy. The search engine care more about the relevancy of
their listings than anything else. They want the surfer to find
exactly what it is he or she searched for. That is the bottom
line. The rest is semantics.
The search engines are not going to penalize you for using what
some search engine optimizers will tell you is an evil method,
besides actual pure spam, if you are using it to promote relevant
search results.
Some Basic Examples
Some optimizers will tell you that you should not link to a
restaurant web site from a retail hardware web site, quoting the
phrase of, it is not relevant to your web site. However this is
not the type of relevancy the search engines care about. The only
relevancy that affects their listings is that the link text
(anchor text) is relevant to the web site the link points to.
These optimizers neglect to tell you that.
Some optimizers will tell you that cross-linking your web sites
is the devil's work at play. Again, the search engines only
concern is with relevancy. As long as you maintain relevancy in
your links, I have yet to see bans or penalization for those
reasons. When it does happen, it is generally due to a competitor
being able to write a very good report to the search engine and
usually includes other factors that contribute. There are forums
that share email templates for reporting competitors to the
search engines in a well written, professional sounding manner
with it's members. The funny part is these forums preach
'ethical' SEO.
In Summary
It is not the methods that are bad. It is the way some people use
those methods that makes them bad. But alas, this is not what too
many misguided people preach. Be careful who you listen to. It is
very easy to be pushed the wrong way by people whose only wish is
to impose their morals and thoughts into your thinking.
About the Author:
William Cross has founded a number of internet marketing and
search engine related websites for professionals. One of the
forums he frequents is the #1 ranked
http://www.webworkshop.net/seoforum for 'seo forum' on google.
