Imagine a United Nations body responsible for the recall of faulty human software. Surely they would recall the "male template." Its 10,000 year warranty has expired. Further extensions or bailouts of its failed programs will only exacerbate a doomed strategy.
Its faulty wiring system has resulted in a deranged habituation to violence and war since the beginnings of "civilization" and history. As to the previous 400,000 year period, when women and men decided things together,there's little evidence. Keep in mind that it is men who have recorded all the events of the past. Would they be biased?
Furthermore, an imbalance in their sexual identity--brought about when they unceremoniously overthrew women--has caused them to rely on the bigger-is-better syndrome (a strategy that dogs--wisely--gave up long ago).
When one's sexual identity--really the core of our personhood--if not in balance,all sorts of strange things can happen. That excplains their tendency to wake up and find themselves at war.
Even more dangerous, because of their inherent denial, is their inability to admit fear. This leads men to lie and cover up their mistakes and weaknesses rather than learn from them. Their addictive habit of bailing each other out--government money bailing out corporate greed--is counterproductive, counterintuitive, as well as counterfeit.
These cover-ups or bail outs, whether of Wall Street or Detroit (or the U.K. saving face for Bush in the Iraq catastrophe) only prolong the catastropic descent of the male template into disaster.
Incompetence is rewarded, simply because men work both ends. They're in charge. Men managing men--providing oversight--can't work if there's no foresight to begin with.
Men's blind ambition--to keep everyone in the dark--was successful until Mother Nature caught up with them and slapped them down with global warming.
Only women could question men's foresight and competence. And they've been in recovery from 10,000 years of enforced subjugation and harassment. It was men who decided that women were incompetent 2,000 years ago. After that, if a woman questioned a man's integrity, rationality or virility, she was demonstrating her jealousy, weakness and emotionalism.
Which is why the special UN body needs to have a majority of women (certified female: no Albrights, Thatchers or Merkels need apply--these women demonstrate a remarkable affinity for thinking like men, particularly when it comes to warfare) so that they can finally bring this nightmarish period of history to a close.
The male template, unbalanced from the beginning, has outlived its usefullness. Similar to the outmoded cars it has produced, it is inflexible, slow to change and gets poor mileage.
------
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1046301489
