Effects of the size structure of fish populations

Published: 08th May 2020
Views: N/A

Size-ordered interspecific interactions can change between competition and predation, depending on ontogenetic changes in size connections. I analyzed the effects of common carp (Cyprinus carpio), an omnivorous fish, on the reproductive success of the red-necked grebe (Podiceps grisegena), an avian gape-limited predator, along a fish size gradient made by carrying different age-cohorts in seminatural ponds. Young-of-the-year (0 ) carp were an essential food source for young grebes. Only adult birds could consume 1-year-old (1 ) fish, while 2-year-old (2 ) fish reached a size refuge from grebes. Amphibian larvae were the primary alternate prey to fish, followed by macroinvertebrates, but the wealth of both dramatically decreased along the carp size gradient. Fledging success was 2.8 times greater in ponds with 0 versus 1 carp; in ponds with 1 carp, girls received on average 2.6-3 times less prey biomass from their parents, and over 1/3 of broods endured complete failure. Breeding birds avoided settling on 2 ponds. These results demonstrate that changes in prey fish size arrangement can account for shifts from positive trophic effects on the avian predator to a negative impact on the predator's alternative resources. Nevertheless, competition failed to fully describe the decrease in food resources that are grebe in the existence of big fish, as grebes and carp overlapped little in diet. In experimental cages, 1 carp completely eliminated young larvae of amphibians palatable. In field conditions, ponds were avoided by breeding adults of taxa that were palatable with older carp and 1. Nontrophic interactions including habitat choice by amphibians or macroinvertebrates to avoid big fish may provide an indirect mechanism reinforcing the adverse bottom-up effects of fish on birds. Interactions between prey and predators are highly dynamic and rely on the relative body size of the interacting species. The effects of prey on predators can be particularly diverse in phase- and size-structured systems, where the onto genetic stages of predators may be affected differently from the distinct life stages or cohort-specific body size of raven (e.g. Werner and Hall 1979; De Roos and Persson 2002; Urban 2007). It has been shown that, if young predators and their future raven share resources, the raven can restrict the recruiting of the predator (Werner and Hall 1979; Neill 1975; Olson et al. 1995). We realize much less about bottom-up influences in size-ordered systems, which are open, i.e., at least for a part of the community migration between habitats is permitted and population dynamics depend on dispersal and settlement speeds (Cooper et al. 1990). In open systems, effects related to habitat selection, including avoidance of predators or powerful challengers, can play a crucial role in structuring the community (Lima and Dill 1990; Abrams 1992). As amphibian larvae were the grebes' primary choice food resource in the study system,

Report this article Ask About This Article


Loading...
More to Explore