Use the tools below to copy the article in plain text form, or you can copy it as HTML, ready to copy and paste directly into a web page.
HTML Have Analysts Gotten Honest? Have Analysts Gotten Honest? Author: Mark MahorneyIt caught my attention when I heard an analyst on a popular financial news program tell investors to sell a stock because too many analysts liked the company, citing the fact that there were no sell ratings. It seemed perfectly logical to me that analysts wouldn't be telling investors to sell 3M (MMM), which has one of the most consistent positive earnings records in the history of the stock markets. But being suspicious of conflicts of interest between brokerage firms and analysts I decided to do a bit of fact checking anyway. While the stock did not have any sell ratings at the time of writing, there were quite a few hold ratings. Now I feel compelled to diverge here and say that the hold rating seems quite illogical to me. If a stock is good enough to hold it's good enough to buy, and vice versa if you wouldn't want to buy it then you shouldn't want to hold on to it either. As it turns out, the average analyst rating for 3M was only slightly and insignificantly better than the average for all stocks in the Dow Jones Industrial Average, of which the company is a component. But what was most interesting about the ratings on Dow components was that, despite numerous and serious legal problems, AIG (AIG) was tied with General Electric (GE) and Du Pont (DD) for the third best rating, only bested by Citigroup (C) and Microsoft (MSFT). AIG was actually more highly recommended by analysts than J.P. Morgan Chase's (JPM) and American Express (AXP). This didn't do much for my confidence in analyst ratings. So I dug a little deeper looking at the more statistically significant S&P 500. What I found was that companies in the index with the worst revenue performance did actually carry more sell ratings than companies with the best performance. At least analysts were using the sell rating, something they seldom did in the past. There was, however, a significant bias towards the neutral `Hold' rating for all stocks indicating reluctance on the part of analysts to commit to buy and sell recommendations. Mark Mahorney www.MarketSpectator.com www.BlogginWallStreet.com www.MarketBlog.com Article Source: http://www.articlealley.com/http://markmahorney.articlealley.com/have-analysts-gotten-honest-5025.html Occupation: Webmaster Mark Mahorney www.MarketSpectator.com www.BlogginWallStreet.com www.MarketBlog.com Contact him at http://www.MarketSpectator.com http://www.MarketSpectator.com Text Have Analysts Gotten Honest? Author: Mark Mahorney It caught my attention when I heard an analyst on a popular financial news program tell investors to sell a stock because too many analysts liked the company, citing the fact that there were no sell ratings. It seemed perfectly logical to me that analysts wouldn't be telling investors to sell 3M (MMM), which has one of the most consistent positive earnings records in the history of the stock markets. But being suspicious of conflicts of interest between brokerage firms and analysts I decided to do a bit of fact checking anyway. While the stock did not have any sell ratings at the time of writing, there were quite a few hold ratings. Now I feel compelled to diverge here and say that the hold rating seems quite illogical to me. If a stock is good enough to hold it's good enough to buy, and vice versa if you wouldn't want to buy it then you shouldn't want to hold on to it either. As it turns out, the average analyst rating for 3M was only slightly and insignificantly better than the average for all stocks in the Dow Jones Industrial Average, of which the company is a component. But what was most interesting about the ratings on Dow components was that, despite numerous and serious legal problems, AIG (AIG) was tied with General Electric (GE) and Du Pont (DD) for the third best rating, only bested by Citigroup (C) and Microsoft (MSFT). AIG was actually more highly recommended by analysts than J.P. Morgan Chase's (JPM) and American Express (AXP). This didn't do much for my confidence in analyst ratings. So I dug a little deeper looking at the more statistically significant S&P 500. What I found was that companies in the index with the worst revenue performance did actually carry more sell ratings than companies with the best performance. At least analysts were using the sell rating, something they seldom did in the past. There was, however, a significant bias towards the neutral `Hold' rating for all stocks indicating reluctance on the part of analysts to commit to buy and sell recommendations. Mark Mahorney www.MarketSpectator.com www.BlogginWallStreet.com www.MarketBlog.com Article Source: http://www.articlealley.com/http://markmahorney.articlealley.com/have-analysts-gotten-honest-5025.html About the Author: Mark Mahorney www.MarketSpectator.com www.BlogginWallStreet.com www.MarketBlog.com Contact him at http://www.MarketSpectator.com http://www.MarketSpectator.com Article Title: Article Keywords: return to article Author by Mark Mahorney Mark Mahorney www.MarketSpectator.com www.BlogginWallStreet.com www.MarketBlog.com Contact him at http://www.MarketSpectator.com URL: http://www.MarketSpectator.com ads similar articles Plastics Stocks for Investing"I just want to say one word to you...just one word. Are you listening? Plastics...There's a great future in Plastics." - Mr. McGuire to Ben Braddock in The Graduate The Graduate was released in 1967, but Mr. McGuire's advice about plastics would make ......Financial analyst job description and profileWilling to become a financial analyst and join some financial institutions? That is a good career move that you have made. Indeed financial analysts have promising career opportunities and there are many institutions where financial analysts are required ......Equity Research Online Certification ProgramWhat is Equity Research? Equity Research analysts follow stocks and make recommendations on whether to buy, sell, or hold those securities using Fundamental Analysis. Equity analysts typically focus on one sector and will cover up to 20 companies' sto......Stock Trading Vs Commodity Trading-Where You Can Get A Better Return?Many investors feel afraid of investing in commodities. Commodities investing over the years has been seen as a risky asset class. Now, if we make a statistical comparison of commodities as an asset class with the other asset classes especially with stock......Is Your Insurance Company Going Out of Business?By Lance Wallach Do your clients have life insurance or annuity policies? If so, they - and you - may be in trouble. The plummeting financial markets are dragging down the life insurance industry, which is an important component of the U.S. economy....... Tags Financeamerican expressdow jonesbest performancestock marketsnews programj p morgan chasej p morgandow jones industrial averagebrokerage firmsconflicts of interestmsft socialize ads
Text Have Analysts Gotten Honest? Author: Mark Mahorney It caught my attention when I heard an analyst on a popular financial news program tell investors to sell a stock because too many analysts liked the company, citing the fact that there were no sell ratings. It seemed perfectly logical to me that analysts wouldn't be telling investors to sell 3M (MMM), which has one of the most consistent positive earnings records in the history of the stock markets. But being suspicious of conflicts of interest between brokerage firms and analysts I decided to do a bit of fact checking anyway. While the stock did not have any sell ratings at the time of writing, there were quite a few hold ratings. Now I feel compelled to diverge here and say that the hold rating seems quite illogical to me. If a stock is good enough to hold it's good enough to buy, and vice versa if you wouldn't want to buy it then you shouldn't want to hold on to it either. As it turns out, the average analyst rating for 3M was only slightly and insignificantly better than the average for all stocks in the Dow Jones Industrial Average, of which the company is a component. But what was most interesting about the ratings on Dow components was that, despite numerous and serious legal problems, AIG (AIG) was tied with General Electric (GE) and Du Pont (DD) for the third best rating, only bested by Citigroup (C) and Microsoft (MSFT). AIG was actually more highly recommended by analysts than J.P. Morgan Chase's (JPM) and American Express (AXP). This didn't do much for my confidence in analyst ratings. So I dug a little deeper looking at the more statistically significant S&P 500. What I found was that companies in the index with the worst revenue performance did actually carry more sell ratings than companies with the best performance. At least analysts were using the sell rating, something they seldom did in the past. There was, however, a significant bias towards the neutral `Hold' rating for all stocks indicating reluctance on the part of analysts to commit to buy and sell recommendations. Mark Mahorney www.MarketSpectator.com www.BlogginWallStreet.com www.MarketBlog.com Article Source: http://www.articlealley.com/http://markmahorney.articlealley.com/have-analysts-gotten-honest-5025.html About the Author: Mark Mahorney www.MarketSpectator.com www.BlogginWallStreet.com www.MarketBlog.com Contact him at http://www.MarketSpectator.com http://www.MarketSpectator.com
return to article