Use the tools below to copy the article in plain text form, or you can copy it as HTML, ready to copy and paste directly into a web page.
HTML The Human Index The Human Index Author: Geoff GannonAs the Dow approaches a new all-time high (the record close was 11,722.98), now would be a good time to take a break from the financial news found on your televisions, in your newspapers, (and yes) even on your computers. A new high is an empty headline. I'm not writing to tell you that; you already know that. What you may not fully appreciate is just how arbitrary an index the Dow Jones Industrial Average really is. Most notably, it's no longer very industrial. Only about one of every three stocks in the Dow is involved in what might be considered an old-line industrial (heavy manufacturing, extraction, etc.) business. A lot of the Dow components are involved in totally different businesses such as consumer products, health care, and technology. For the most part, these businesses are usually a lot less tangible. The businesses are asset-light; the future prospects are largely company specific. Today, the extent to which the common stocks of the thirty companies move together may have more to do with their shared classification as "Dow" stocks than with the future prospects of the underlying businesses. On April 8, 2004 some changes were made to the Dow. These weren't the first changes and they won't be the last. Such changes add to the arbitrary nature of the index, especially in the short-term. Generally, the changes have been motivated more by who should go than with who should come in. Discarded Dow components can usually blame a dying industry for their exit. Sometimes, a rapidly dwindling market cap helped. The April 2004 changes involved three spots in the index and six stocks. Departures: AT&T (T), Eastman Kodak (EK), and International Paper (IP). Arrivals: Verizon (VZ), American International Group (AIG), and Pfizer (PFE). Please note that AT&T is now back in the Dow. In November 2005, SBC Communications, which was itself born from the 1984 divestiture agreement between AT&T and the Justice Department, changed its name to AT&T after acquiring that company. It also adopted the ticker symbol associated with that name (T). As a result, a chart of the new AT&T does not reflect the fortunes of the old AT&T. None of these stocks has fared particularly well. In fact, since the changes, they've all basically underperformed the S&P 500. With the exception of Kodak (and Verizon for a very short time), none of the stocks have managed to trade above the share price they had at the time of the reshuffle Is this just a coincidence? As a rule, reshuffling an index through human intervention is likely to produce odd (and unexpected) coincidences. The Dow is made up of a small number of companies. These companies tend to be very high-profile businesses. They are also high-profile stocks. Usually, they were high-profile stocks before they entered; but, obviously, being added to the Dow only increases investor interest in their fortunes. Any human intervention is likely to reflect the (current) biases of investors (and the financial media). The result? A very human index. Article Source: http://www.articlealley.com/http://geoffgannon.articlealley.com/the-human-index-89888.html Occupation: Investment Writer Geoff Gannon writes a daily value investing blog and produces a twice weekly (half hour) value investing podcast at http://www.gannononinvesting.com http://www.gannononinvesting.com Text The Human Index Author: Geoff Gannon As the Dow approaches a new all-time high (the record close was 11,722.98), now would be a good time to take a break from the financial news found on your televisions, in your newspapers, (and yes) even on your computers. A new high is an empty headline. I'm not writing to tell you that; you already know that. What you may not fully appreciate is just how arbitrary an index the Dow Jones Industrial Average really is. Most notably, it's no longer very industrial. Only about one of every three stocks in the Dow is involved in what might be considered an old-line industrial (heavy manufacturing, extraction, etc.) business. A lot of the Dow components are involved in totally different businesses such as consumer products, health care, and technology. For the most part, these businesses are usually a lot less tangible. The businesses are asset-light; the future prospects are largely company specific. Today, the extent to which the common stocks of the thirty companies move together may have more to do with their shared classification as "Dow" stocks than with the future prospects of the underlying businesses. On April 8, 2004 some changes were made to the Dow. These weren't the first changes and they won't be the last. Such changes add to the arbitrary nature of the index, especially in the short-term. Generally, the changes have been motivated more by who should go than with who should come in. Discarded Dow components can usually blame a dying industry for their exit. Sometimes, a rapidly dwindling market cap helped. The April 2004 changes involved three spots in the index and six stocks. Departures: AT&T (T), Eastman Kodak (EK), and International Paper (IP). Arrivals: Verizon (VZ), American International Group (AIG), and Pfizer (PFE). Please note that AT&T is now back in the Dow. In November 2005, SBC Communications, which was itself born from the 1984 divestiture agreement between AT&T and the Justice Department, changed its name to AT&T after acquiring that company. It also adopted the ticker symbol associated with that name (T). As a result, a chart of the new AT&T does not reflect the fortunes of the old AT&T. None of these stocks has fared particularly well. In fact, since the changes, they've all basically underperformed the S&P 500. With the exception of Kodak (and Verizon for a very short time), none of the stocks have managed to trade above the share price they had at the time of the reshuffle Is this just a coincidence? As a rule, reshuffling an index through human intervention is likely to produce odd (and unexpected) coincidences. The Dow is made up of a small number of companies. These companies tend to be very high-profile businesses. They are also high-profile stocks. Usually, they were high-profile stocks before they entered; but, obviously, being added to the Dow only increases investor interest in their fortunes. Any human intervention is likely to reflect the (current) biases of investors (and the financial media). The result? A very human index. Article Source: http://www.articlealley.com/http://geoffgannon.articlealley.com/the-human-index-89888.html About the Author: Geoff Gannon writes a daily value investing blog and produces a twice weekly (half hour) value investing podcast at http://www.gannononinvesting.com http://www.gannononinvesting.com Article Title: Article Keywords: return to article Author by Geoff Gannon Geoff Gannon writes a daily value investing blog and produces a twice weekly (half hour) value investing podcast at http://www.gannononinvesting.com URL: http://www.gannononinvesting.com ads similar articles UK Bridging LoansThe value of UK Bridging Loans for the property developer Realising the value of UK bridging loans to the property developer can be the difference between success and failure. Many property developers often look for the quickest way to buy property, ma......What are shares? a quick basic guide to investmentsIn an effort to raise funds in order to help with business expansion efforts, there are several possible options open to a company. One route that can be taken is to set up a loan, and then pay interest on the money borrowed to pay off the debt, while an......3 Ways to Consolidate Credit Card DebtsMany of us have fallen into the trap of overindulging on our credit cards. And who can blame us? We waltz through the department stores and they constantly tempt us with their seemingly never ending sales. Clearance sales, Winter sales, January sales, it ......Credit Counseling What Is?If you are in difficulty financially, you have in all probability heard the term "credit counseling," however do you understand what it is? Most times this term is used in the same sentence as debt negotiation or debt settlement, however in fact,it is an ......For Immediate Money UK Payday LoansPeople earn .. and people spend. A balance is maintained between this earning and spending. When this balance is disrupted, trouble comes for you making your earning insufficient for your expenses for a short period of time. For financing your expenditure...... Tags Financedow jones industrialdow jonesaigfinancial newspfizerdow jones industrial averagefuture prospectsmarket capeastman kodakcommon stocksdepartures socialize ads
Text The Human Index Author: Geoff Gannon As the Dow approaches a new all-time high (the record close was 11,722.98), now would be a good time to take a break from the financial news found on your televisions, in your newspapers, (and yes) even on your computers. A new high is an empty headline. I'm not writing to tell you that; you already know that. What you may not fully appreciate is just how arbitrary an index the Dow Jones Industrial Average really is. Most notably, it's no longer very industrial. Only about one of every three stocks in the Dow is involved in what might be considered an old-line industrial (heavy manufacturing, extraction, etc.) business. A lot of the Dow components are involved in totally different businesses such as consumer products, health care, and technology. For the most part, these businesses are usually a lot less tangible. The businesses are asset-light; the future prospects are largely company specific. Today, the extent to which the common stocks of the thirty companies move together may have more to do with their shared classification as "Dow" stocks than with the future prospects of the underlying businesses. On April 8, 2004 some changes were made to the Dow. These weren't the first changes and they won't be the last. Such changes add to the arbitrary nature of the index, especially in the short-term. Generally, the changes have been motivated more by who should go than with who should come in. Discarded Dow components can usually blame a dying industry for their exit. Sometimes, a rapidly dwindling market cap helped. The April 2004 changes involved three spots in the index and six stocks. Departures: AT&T (T), Eastman Kodak (EK), and International Paper (IP). Arrivals: Verizon (VZ), American International Group (AIG), and Pfizer (PFE). Please note that AT&T is now back in the Dow. In November 2005, SBC Communications, which was itself born from the 1984 divestiture agreement between AT&T and the Justice Department, changed its name to AT&T after acquiring that company. It also adopted the ticker symbol associated with that name (T). As a result, a chart of the new AT&T does not reflect the fortunes of the old AT&T. None of these stocks has fared particularly well. In fact, since the changes, they've all basically underperformed the S&P 500. With the exception of Kodak (and Verizon for a very short time), none of the stocks have managed to trade above the share price they had at the time of the reshuffle Is this just a coincidence? As a rule, reshuffling an index through human intervention is likely to produce odd (and unexpected) coincidences. The Dow is made up of a small number of companies. These companies tend to be very high-profile businesses. They are also high-profile stocks. Usually, they were high-profile stocks before they entered; but, obviously, being added to the Dow only increases investor interest in their fortunes. Any human intervention is likely to reflect the (current) biases of investors (and the financial media). The result? A very human index. Article Source: http://www.articlealley.com/http://geoffgannon.articlealley.com/the-human-index-89888.html About the Author: Geoff Gannon writes a daily value investing blog and produces a twice weekly (half hour) value investing podcast at http://www.gannononinvesting.com http://www.gannononinvesting.com
return to article