Researching the possible effects of lost or discarded soft plastic fishing lures on fish as well as

Published: 18th May 2020
Views: N/A

Recreational fishing is a popular activity across the earth (Cooke and Cowx 2004) and especially in areas like North America (Arlinghaus and Cooke 2009). In Canada alone, over 3.3 million residents participated in recreational fishing in 2010 and collectively spent over 39 million angler days (DFO 2012). In 2006, in the united states, over 33.9 million residents went fishing at least once during that interval (USFWS 2007). Recreational fishing supplies massive socioeconomic benefits, and consequently, many water bodies in North America are managed to optimize gains for anglers and society (Arlinghaus and Cooke 2009; UN 2012). Recently, there continues to be a growing realization that recreational fishing, despite the use of modern fisheries management strategies, can possess various negative effects that extend beyond exploitation (McPhee et al. 2002). Fishing gear is lost haphazardly by reckless anglers (i.e. trashing) and, more generally, as unintentional loss by responsible anglers (e.g. when line breaks during a failed cast, when gear becomes entangled in debris). To accentuate the potential magnitude of tools loss, a study in Minnesota (Radomski et al. 2006) interviewed 8,068 boat anglers for five walleye (Sander vitreus) fisheries and found 80 % of anglers reported tackle loss, translating to a loss rate of 0.0127 pieces per hour. Connecting this to angler numbers and hours spent fishing, this equated to over 100,000 lead-based items lost in the summer of 2004 alone. O'Toole et al. (2009) surveyed bank fishing sites in Ontario and found a variety of litter, including fishing line, lures and packaging from fishing gear (e.g. worm containers, fishing gear packaging). Fowl ingestion of lead sinkers is well examined (Scheuhammer and Norris 1996; Franson et al. 2003), and there are a variety of efforts underway by authorities, anglers and the fishing sector to 'get the lead out' through education programs and development of nontoxic alternatives (Goddard et al. 2008). Hooks can be ingested by various organisms (reviewed in Cooke and Cowx 2006) and lost line may become entangled in animals (Derraik 2002) and has also contributed to degradation of coral habitats (Yoshikawa and Asoh 2004). Tackle loss has got the capacity to create difficulties for a number of wildlife, but birds happen to be the focus of most studies. Soft plastic fishing lures (SPLs) have been generally used in the angling community since the early 1970s. Soft plastic lures closely resemble natural forage and supply an alternate to live lure that is cumbersome. With growing concern for bait and biosecurity transfer, there exists added recent interest in the utilization of SPLs to get a variety of fisheries. Another advantage to the usage of SPLs is that they're far more durable than live bait, permitting one to catch multiple fish per bait. Longevity that is following and this lastingness is a result of their being composed of inert non -biodegradable synthetic polymers. Now, you will find numerous types and brands of soft plastic lures, and for the most part, they're the same general makeup, softened plastic which contains phthalates added to polyvinyl chloride or another products that are similar. Similar to lead sinkers/ fishing gear, SPLs have the potential to be lost or discarded in aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems.

Report this article Ask About This Article

More to Explore